Natural
Gas pricing announced on 18th October, 2014 has once again confirmed
that it is based on politics and not on Fair market concept. In reality, UPA
Government decision in 2007 broke the backbone of Fair Natural Gas Pricing
system when Pricing was fixed, disregarding Gas on Gas competition-Arm’s Length
pricing envisaged in PSC.Subsequently, it was all politics and nothing else.
Let us not forget—it was all intentional to favour one producer.
Pricing
Policies:
On 18th
October, 2014, the Government of India announced revision in Natural gas Pricing
effective from 1st November, 2014.The current price from November,
2014 to March 2015 is $5.05/MMBTU based on Gross Calorific Value (GCV) and
$5.55/MMBTU on Net Calorific Value (NCV) i.e. on the same basis as earlier price
of $4.2/MMBTU fixed in 2007 for 5 years. The revised price is certainly
significantly lower compared to $ 8.4/MMBTU; the price almost fixed by the UPA government
but could not be implemented.
The issue
is not about lower or higher price but Fair Price?
Dr.Rangarajan
committee, set up by UPA government based its pricing on:
(i)
Netback
pricing of Japanese LNG,
(ii)
Henry Hub Gas price in USA and
(iii)
National
balancing Point (NBP) Gas price in UK.
Pricing
Review Committee (PRC-2014) set up by NDA government made following changes to
the earlier pricing based on Dr.Rangarajan committee:
(a)
Netback pricing of Japanese and Indian import component of LNG is removed.
(b)Canadian
(Alberta) gas price is included in lieu of Henry hub Gas price.
© Russian
gas price is included in lieu of National Balancing Point (NBP) price of UK.
The
notified pricing will be reviewed and revised half yearly
Politics
of Pricing!
PRC-2014
is right in removing the LNG component from the Gas pricing formula as price of
LNG has no relevance to the price of Natural Gas, but it is not clear why
pricing based on Henry Hub is changed to Alberta and NBP to Russian. It is
requested that the details are published to bring transparency.
Both
Dr.Rangarajan and PRC-2014 have premised that the price of indigenously
produced Natural Gas in India is linked to the prices prevailing in various/some
parts of the world. It is acceptable, if either Natural Gas in India is the
natural home from these locations or it is traded internationally like Oil.
Unfortunately, neither is true and therefore, the pricing mechanisms of both
the committees are conceptually flawed and unfair.
It appears
that Dr .Rangarajan had a pre-scripted Gas Price from UPA and PRC-2014 from NDA
government .Both the committees did the rest to please their political bosses. In
the absence of details, we do not see any other justification for linking
prices to such alien locations having no relevance to Natural Gas produced in
India. It is sad that PRC-2014had an opportunity to correct the conceptual
flaws and anomalies of Dr.Rangarajan’s formula as expert opinions and criticism
on it click were already in the public domain
Real
damage to the pricing concept of Natural Gas was done in 2007,when UPA
Government arbitrarily disregarded the clause of “Arm’s Length Pricing”
of(Production Sharing Contract) PSC and fixed the price of Natural gas at
$4.2/MMBTU through manipulated tendering system carried out by Reliance on the
directive of the Government. Today, it
is impossible to use the concept of Arm’s Length Price of PSC, which is based on
Gas on Gas competition as Indian natural Gas market is imbalanced due to fiasco
in gas production in Krishna Godavari basin.
It is true
that “international Oil prices are dependent upon geo political factors” But it
is sad to note that Natural gas Price is being used as political tool in India and
has destroyed the basic fabric of fair pricing.
The issue
now arises—what is next?
Forward
Path:
We believe
that so much damage has been done in pricing of Natural Gas since 2007 that it
is now not possible to repair the same and revert back to PSC for existing producing
fields. At best, we can prevent further damage and erosion of faith in The
Indian system by the stakeholders and international community.
Suggested
Mechanism:
In 2007,
Natural Gas price was linked to Brent crude oil. Linking the price to Brent crude oil is not the
best option as gas price should be linked to the competing fuel oil, which is
Fuel Oil, Naphtha and/or Coal dependent upon its end use. It is true that
Brent is internationally traded crude oil with transparent pricing. Price of
Naphtha and Fuel Oil are also linked to Crude oil prices. Pricing mechanism linked
to competing Fuel is being used for almost 23% of world Gas production and is
considered the best method for pricing Gas where the same cannot be fixed on
Gas on Gas Competition.
Conclusion:
The
Price of Natural Gas in India for existing producing fields should be linked to
Oil. It will be desirable to link it to the basket of Naphtha, Fuel Oil and/or
coal. Since Gas price in 2007 was linked to Brent Crude Oil, it may also be
alright to include Brent Crude Oil in
the basket. Review should take place only if price of one or more of the linked
product(s) crosses the band on either side. Otherwise, Formula is binding.
Why not link it to brent crude or some such benchmark worldover, while renegotiating the national resoure price, if at all RIL agreement for exploration and exploitation has to be extended
ReplyDeleteOnce the contract has expired,no one has the right to extend it.If it is extended unilaterally by any Government,it would mean favouring one company over the rest.I have no doubt that it will have the same fate as Coal Blocks. The only correct solution will be to go for international bidding.In the international bidding,GOI can go for PSC or Revenue sharing.According to Dr.Rangarajan, Revenue sharing is better,but Dr.Kelkar is supporting PSC mechanism. I support Revenue sharing after in depth studies of both the mechanisms with specific reference to India.
DeleteAs regards,linking the price to brent, I have already discussed this subject in my blog.
Thank you,
Once the contract has expired,no one has the right to extend it.If it is extended unilaterally by any Government,it would mean favouring one company over the rest.I have no doubt that it will have the same fate as Coal Blocks. The only correct solution will be to go for international bidding.In the international bidding,GOI can go for PSC or Revenue sharing.According to Dr.Rangarajan, Revenue sharing is better,but Dr.Kelkar is supporting PSC mechanism. I support Revenue sharing after in depth studies of both the mechanisms with specific reference to India.
ReplyDeleteAs regards,linking the price to brent, I have already discussed this subject in my blog.
Thank you,